• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION CAROTID WALLSTENT; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION CAROTID WALLSTENT; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Model Number 26605
Device Problems Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Activation Failure (3270)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 08/19/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the shaft detached.The target lesion was located in the non-tortuous left internal carotid artery.A 9x40 carotid wallstent was successfully deployed.A 9 x 30 carotid wallstent was then selected for use.The stent was unable to be deployed.The device was unable to be completely pulled back.The shaft of the device detached 1 cm proximal from the proximal marker band.There was no strong resistance felt.Blood flowed over the right carotid through the circulum vilicity because the left side was occluded with the detached component.A new 9 x 30 carotid wallstent was implanted to affix and appose the detached component to the vessel wall.The patient condition after the procedure was fine and no adverse effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Initial reporter phone: (b)(6).Device analysis by mfr: the returned device consisted of carotid monorail.A visual and tactile examination of the catheter and delivery system identified a complete separation of the outer shaft located at the guidewire port.A complete separation of the inner shaft was also noted located proximal of the proximal markerband.The detached sections of the inner and outer shaft were not returned for analysis.This included the stent, both markerbands and the tip.This type of damage is consistent with excessive tensile force being applied to the device when attempting to remove it from the patient.A review of the angiographic images provided by the customer clearly indicates a restriction in the vessel where the first placed stent can be seen to narrow significantly.It is possible that when the physician attempted to deploy the second stent that the restriction in the vessel prevented them from doing so.The restriction would also have contributed to the resistance experienced as the user attempted to remove the device from the patient.The shaft separation is consistent with excessive tensile force being applied to the device when resistance is encountered during withdrawal.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the shaft detached.The target lesion was located in the non-tortuous left internal carotid artery.A 9x40 carotid wallstent was successfully deployed.A 9x30 carotid wallstent was then selected for use.The stent was unable to be deployed.The device was unable to be completely pulled back.The shaft of the device detached 1 cm proximal from the proximal marker band.There was no strong resistance felt.Blood flowed over the right carotid through the circulum vilicity because the left side was occluded with the detached component.A new 9x30 carotid wallstent was implanted to affix and appose the detached component to the vessel wall.The patient condition after the procedure was fine and no adverse effects were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAROTID WALLSTENT
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
MDR Report Key9036065
MDR Text Key161054664
Report Number2134265-2019-11187
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P050019
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/03/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/01/2023
Device Model Number26605
Device Catalogue Number26605
Device Lot Number0024051117
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/05/2019
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/19/2019
Initial Date FDA Received09/13/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/17/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/03/2019
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-