Exemption number (b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents reported from this lot.All available information was investigated and a conclusive cause for the reported leak (loss of fluid column) in this incident could not be determined.The reported untended movement (loss of transseptal access); however, appears to be related to procedural circumstances.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
This is being filed to report unintended movement and leak.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4+.The clip was successfully deployed; however, when the clip delivery system was being retracted into the steerable guide catheter (sgc), the transseptal access was lost.It was noted that the physician did not confirm if the sgc was still across the right atrium and left atrium after deployment.Transseptal access had to be regained; therefore, the sgc was being re-prepped, but the hemostatic valve would not maintain column.Three attempts were made, but there was still loss of fluid column.The sgc was not re-introduced into the patient, and the procedure was successfully completed with a new sgc.Two clips were implanted, reducing mr to less than 1.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.
|