Model Number F7-029 |
Device Problem
Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
|
Patient Problem
Mitral Regurgitation (1964)
|
Event Date 08/19/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2019, a patient received a carbomedics optiform f7-029 in mitral position.The leaflets were tested after the implant and no issue was identified at that time.At the end of the procedure, normal valve function was observed.However, later in the afternoon, at the ultrasound it was noticed that one of the leaflets was not closing properly thus resulting in regurgitation from the side of the leaflet.It was consequently decided to perform a reoperation.During the re-do surgery, no impediment to the leaflet mobility was identified.The optiform f7-029 was explanted and replaced with a st.Jude valve size 29.The patient's conditions after the re-intervention are reportedly good.Before explanting of the carbomedics valve, the patient had hematuria, and the hematuria disappeared after the valve replacement.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6)2019, a patient received a carbomedics optiform f7-029 in the mitral position.After the implant, the leaflets were tested and no issue was identified at that time.No functional defects were reported and normal valve function was observed.However, during the ultrasound check at the end of the surgical procedure, it was noticed that one of the leaflets was not closing properly thus resulting in regurgitation from the side of the leaflet.It was consequently decided to perform a reoperation immediately.At the time of explant of the device, the leaflet was checked again but no impediment was identified.The optiform f7-029 was explanted and replaced with a st.Jude valve size 29.The patient had a good outcome after the procedure.Before explanting of the carbomedics valve, the patient had hematuria, and the hematuria disappeared after the valve replacement.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturer received additional information clarifying that the re-operation of the patient occurred at the end of the first surgical procedure.The patient did not leave the operating room between the first and second mitral valve replacement procedures.The event description in section b5 has been properly updated.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The returned device underwent a visual and macroscopic inspections according to procedure.The results confirmed the absence of manufacturing defects.Based on the performed analysis and document review, the reported issue cannot be explained by any factor intrinsic to the involved device.As reported, the device was inspected after the implant and before the explant, and no allegation of malfunction or deficits were reported.It is possible that the procedural context and/or patient factors contributed to the event, although this cannot be ultimately confirmed.The root cause of the event remains ultimately unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A complete manufacturing and material records review for the device has been performed.The results confirmed that the device satisfied all material, visual and performance standards required at the time of manufacture and release, including a functional test performed on march 06, 2019.The device was returned to the manufacturer and it was received on 17 oct 2019.The returned valve was received in generally good conditions with some signs of stitching on the sewing cuff.The leaflets were free to open.Further investigation is ongoing.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|