• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND BTK TURBOHAWK; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND BTK TURBOHAWK; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number THS-SX-C
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problems Injury (2348); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 09/12/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Physician was attempting to use a turbohawk atherectomy along with non medtronic 6fr sheath and guide wire to treat a little calcified lesion in the common iliac artery.The vessel is severely tortuous with a diameter of 7mm.The vessel was pre dilated but not post dilated.Ifu was followed during preparation, procedure and post procedure.It was reported that during withdrawal, minimal resistance was encountered and the tip separated at hinge pin (nose cone).There was no guide wire prolapse.It was reported that the nose cone was completely removed from the shaft of the catheter.The nose cone was stented (caged) into the iliac artery.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: the location of the pins is unknown.A visipro stent was used to cage the nose cone.Patient is not scheduled for additional intervention.Patient is doing well.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation the turbohawk device and cutter driver were removed from the return packaging for inspection.The turbohawk was connected to the cutter driver.A bend was noted in the torque shaft beneath the strain relief.It was observed the distal assembly was fractured apart.The distal housing, including coiled segment and rotating distal tip, was not returned for evaluation.A radial fracture was observed between the anchor pockets and proximal end of the coiled segment of the housing.The cutter was advanced approximately 2.8cm distal from the cutter window.Microscopic inspection revealed suspected pet wrapped around the proximal end of the cutter head.The distal edge of the cutter window housing and a proximal portion of the inner laser drilled coil showed signs of damaged and jagged edges.No damage was noted to the cutter window.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BTK TURBOHAWK
Type of Device
CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
Manufacturer Contact
toni o'doherty
parkmore business park west
galway 
091708734
MDR Report Key9071053
MDR Text Key158693935
Report Number9612164-2019-03942
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCW
UDI-Device Identifier00643169968226
UDI-Public00643169968226
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K103618
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/11/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/03/2022
Device Catalogue NumberTHS-SX-C
Device Lot Number0009815592
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/02/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/12/2019
Initial Date FDA Received09/16/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/23/2019
10/01/2019
12/09/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/25/2019
10/17/2019
12/11/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/04/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
-
-