Patient came into hospital diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis.He underwent catheterization showing normal coronaries and the valve could not be crossed.His ejection fraction was approximately 30%.Patient went to operation room for an edward intuity aortic valve replacement.Patient extubated a few days later, and subsequently re-intubated two days after being extubated.A day after re-intubation patient had echo which showed mild to moderate aortic valve regurgitation; aortic valve prosthesis is normal in appearance.Ejection fraction estimated at 40%.Patient started on amiodarone for a-fib.The next day patient noted to have cardiomegaly on ct.A few days later systolic murmur noted.Cardiologist reviewed previous echo with colleague, noted "paravalvular regurg appears to be significant, prosthesis projecting in out flow." subsequently, another echo done and showed: "rocking of the aortic valve prosthesis and severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation." medical doctor notes: "tee echo without dehiscence of aortic valve prosthesis; patient to surgery; paravalvular leak with dehiscence." in operation room for old valve removal and replacement.Patient recovered and discharged.With speaking with the rn manager after the replacement surgery, she told me that when the heart valve was removed, they found the suture, operation room core knot, wasn't intact; it had broken.It is unclear what may have caused the break.The manager told me that this particular valve is new technology, anchored in with only three sutures; whereas in the past, most valves were placed with thirteen sutures.
|