Model Number 37612 |
Device Problem
Failure to Deliver Energy (1211)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Burning Sensation (2146); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Dyskinesia (2363); Ambulation Difficulties (2544)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for the treatment of dystonia and dbs therapy indi cations.It was reported that the patient's left leg was "spasming so bad" when on their way to an appointment with a healthcare provider (hcp).The patient stated their hcp confirmed the ins was fully charged, but noticed the ins was off.The patient states they did not turn the ins off themselves.No further information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received: it was reported that the patient called in because their hcp told them to call and see if their ins needed to be replaced.The patient said their ins turned itself off 3 times.The first time was in may or june and said that they had charged their ins the night before and didn¿t understand why they were in pain and knew something was wrong.The patient said that they weren¿t able to walk and had to get a wheel chair, then found that the device was off.The patient said it was due to the ins depleting.The second time the ins turned off was a few weeks after the first time and said that they were at home laying down.They said they woke up to a strange electrical burning and their teeth were chattering.They got up and turned their ins back on and the ins wasn¿t depleted.The third time the device turned off by itself was in the last week and the ins was also not depleted.It was reviewed to replace the ins was a medical decision and the rep could come to the appointment if the hcp would like.There were no further complications reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was stated the healthcare provider (hcp) turned the implantable neurostimulator (ins) back on and advised the patient to check the ins status every other day.The patient stated they do and noted that the ins was on whenever they checked with the patient programmer (pp).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received that the patient called the hcp on (b)(6) 2019 and said dbs had turned off by itself "3 times since last visit." it was stated the patient was seen (b)(6) 2019.Their patient programmer (pp) was turned back on and the voltage was adjusted.The ins was 100% charged.It was stated "new wires" were received from medtronic and that the patient was "still sore, likely from dbs being off." the most likely cause of the muscle spasms was stated to be due to being unaware the device was off.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|