Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4) investigation summary: the complaint device was received and evaluated.No anomalies were observed on the exterior of the device.When tested for its functionality, the device functions as intended.However the device was able to cut with a little difficulty, the handle seems to stick slightly and not operating in a smooth manner.This complaint cannot be confirmed as the reported failure was not clear at this time.The information provided is not sufficient to discern a definitive root cause, however, typically when remnants of debris are logged between the outer and inner shaft, this hinders the device from operating smoothly.At this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further actions is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.This report is being filed as required under mitek's corrective and preventative actions (capa) to file usa fda mdr missed malfunctions.
|
It was reported by the affiliate in (b)(6) that the cord cutter device was broken.It was not reported if the device was used in surgery, or if there was patient involvement.It was not reported if there were any delays in the surgical procedure, or if a spare device was available for use.There were no reports of any injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|