It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a 90% stenosed lesion in the distal superficial femoral artery.The lesion was pre-dilatated with a 6x200mm balloon catheter at 8 atmospheres and atherectomy was performed.A 6fr sheath was used.A 6.0x150mm supera stent was being deployed; however, the stent migrated before being fully deployed.During removal, the thumb slide was not fully retracted to the start position and both the system and deployment levers were not locked prior to removal without the use of fluoroscopy.The self-expanding stent system (sess) became caught with the guiding catheter and the nose cone detached.A snare was used to remove the separated nose cone.The procedure was successfully completed with the deployment of a second unspecified stent.There were no adverse patient sequela and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
Exemption number e2019001.The device was not returned for evaluation.The lot history record (lhr) for this product could not be reviewed and a similar complaint query could not be performed because the product was not returned for evaluation and the lot number was not reported.The supera instruction for use (ifu) instructs: following confirmed implantation of the supera stent, retract the thumb slide in a single motion to the starting position on the handle and rotate the system lock and deployment lock into the locked position, in line with the thumb slide.Under fluoroscopy, remove the device from the guide wire and evaluate the improved luminal quality of the treated area.In this case, failing to retract and lock the thumbslide into place and remove the device under fluoroscopy appears to be the likely cause for the reported difficulty removing and tip detachment.Based on the information provided, the reported difficulties appear to be user/case related.Failing to retract and lock the thumbslide into place and remove the device under fluoroscopy appears to be the likely cause for the reported difficulties.The additional treatment to remove the separated tip was due to case circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|