• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SILK ROAD MEDICAL, INC. ENROUTE TRANSCAROTID NEUROPROTECTION SYSTEM; TEMPORARY CAROTID CATHETER FOR EMBOLIC CAPTURE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SILK ROAD MEDICAL, INC. ENROUTE TRANSCAROTID NEUROPROTECTION SYSTEM; TEMPORARY CAROTID CATHETER FOR EMBOLIC CAPTURE Back to Search Results
Model Number SR-200-NPS
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688); Vascular Dissection (3160)
Event Date 09/05/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product in complaint was not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.A review of the manufacturing records for this device was completed and no issues were identified that could have lead to the adverse event reported.Complaints will continue to be monitored for any trends.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a (b)(6) male patient with a contralateral occlusion, underwent the transcarotid artery revascularization (tcar) procedure on (b)(6) 2019.Venous, micro puncture and arterial sheath access were all gained and in accordance with the ifu.Unprotected flow was also reported to be smooth.According to the physician, while attempting to engage the lesion, the 0.14 enroute wire was not performing.After attempting a few times to advance the wire past the lesion, it was observed that the wire was backed out.An angiogram was taken, which confirmed the presence of a dissection.The physician believes that the wire was possibly in a dissection plane.In an attempt to get out of the dissection plane, the physician backed the sheath out.However, the wire was still not advancing as expected.The physician removed the wire and the balloon, disconnected the nps, and removed the sheath to re-access the proximal common carotid artery (cca).A second attempt to access with the micropuncture and enroute arterial sheath was successful.However, two views showed a clearer picture of the dissection off a branch off the external carotid artery (eca).After several unsuccessful attempts to wire the cca and ica, the surgeon made the decision to abort the case.A hematoma was present on the patient's right neck jaw line due to the dissection.A drain was placed at the exposure site.Patient was neuro intact at the end of the procedure and according to the surgeon the patient was doing well post op.No additional details were provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENROUTE TRANSCAROTID NEUROPROTECTION SYSTEM
Type of Device
TEMPORARY CAROTID CATHETER FOR EMBOLIC CAPTURE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SILK ROAD MEDICAL, INC.
1213 innsbruck dr.
sunnyvale CA 94089
Manufacturer (Section G)
SILK ROAD MEDICAL, INC.
1213 innsbruck dr.
sunnyvale CA 94089
Manufacturer Contact
1213 innsbruck dr.
sunnyvale, CA 94089
MDR Report Key9137751
MDR Text Key165549278
Report Number3014526664-2019-00073
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NTE
UDI-Device Identifier00811311020829
UDI-Public(01)00811311020829(17)210103(10)300346
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K153485
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/30/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/03/2021
Device Model NumberSR-200-NPS
Device Catalogue NumberSR-200-NPS
Device Lot Number300346
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/05/2019
Initial Date FDA Received09/30/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age68 YR
-
-