• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMERIEUX, SA VITEK® MS; VITEK MS INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMERIEUX, SA VITEK® MS; VITEK MS INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 410895
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
A customer in (b)(6) notified biomérieux of a misidentification of pseudomonas aeruginosa as mycobacterium tuberculosis when testing a patient isolate with the vitek® ms (ref 410895, serial (b)(4).Repeat analysis of the isolate with the vitek® ms obtained the expected identification of pseudomonas aeruginosa.The customer reported that there was no patient impact.No incorrect result was reported to the physician.A biomérieux internal investigation will be initiated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An internal biomérieux investigation was initiated for a customer report of a misidentification of pseudomonas aeruginosa as mycobacterium tuberculosis when testing a patient isolate with the vitek® ms (ref 410895, serial (b)(6).The customer's strain was not available for submittal for the investigation.The data submitted by the customer was analyzed.*conclusion on the system: the customer's system was operational during the test.However, one mandatory acceptance criterion ("median of number of peaks" ) was not achieved during the fine tuning before the test.A new fine tuning was performed on 30aug2019, and it was in conformance.*conclusion on spot preparation quality: the customer's spot preparation quality was not optimal.The sample "all peaks" values was quite heterogeneous (30 and 82 for the same sample).This could be explained by a non-optimal spot preparation (culture, spot, different operator.).*conclusion on the identification: according to this analysis and morphological aspect of the strain observed, the most probable identification is pseudomonas aeruginosa.If the issue occurs again, this identification should be confirmed by reference method (sequencing).*suspected cause retained: - non-optimal fine tuning.- non-optimal sample spot preparation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITEK® MS
Type of Device
VITEK MS INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMERIEUX, SA
3 route de port michaud
la balme, 38390
FR  38390
MDR Report Key9146244
MDR Text Key219786137
Report Number9615754-2019-00093
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PEX
UDI-Device Identifier03573026359119
UDI-Public03573026359119
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
DEN130013
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/31/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number410895
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/04/2019
Initial Date FDA Received10/02/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/04/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/31/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-