• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA USA, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA USA, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 102
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Pain (1994)
Event Date 09/12/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The physician reports that the patient feels the vns going off almost hourly, but the discomfort level is "tolerable" and she is able to sleep through the night.The physician decided to replace her current vns as they believed that the device was "malfunctioning." the patient's device was explanted and replaced due to "prophylactic" battery replacement.The explanted product has been received by the manufacturer; however, the analysis is underway but has not been completed to date.No other relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Further follow up with the neurologist's office confirmed that the device was checked the date the patient presented with discomfort and altered perception of stimulation; however, that the adverse events did not present until after the patient left the office.The physician informed that during this appointment the vns diagnostics were tested and were confirmed to be within normal limits.Additionally, the vns output frequency was increased from 10hz to 15hz.It was not until after the patient had left the neurologist's office the patient began to experience the symptoms of erratic stimulation, painful stimulation, and coughing.At this point in time, the vns was not re-checked, and the neurologist ultimately decided to refer for prophylactic generator change to upgrade patient from a m102 to m106.No further details were provided from the neurologist¿s office.The explanted generator underwent product analysis, and a comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.In the product analysis lab, the device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment.Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator¿s output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period.The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters, and the generator battery status was ok.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.No other relevant information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 102
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
rachel kohn
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key9162124
MDR Text Key161402739
Report Number1644487-2019-01944
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/01/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date08/09/2012
Device Model Number102
Device Lot Number2773
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/30/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/12/2019
Initial Date FDA Received10/07/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/07/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/01/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/31/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age29 YR
-
-