The device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
It was reported that on an unknown date during routine incoming inspection, the handle with quick coupling was broken.There was no patient involvement.This complaint involves one (1) device.This report is for one (1) handle with quick coupling, small.This is report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: h3, h4, h6: a review of the device history record.Device history lot.Part # 311.43.Synthes lot number: 7292888.Manufacturing site: synthes jennersville.Release to warehouse date: (b)(6)2013.The raw material was confirmed to be correct per the specification with no (relevant) non-conformance noted.Device history batch null, device history review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any sub-components, which would contribute to this complaint condition.H3, h6: investigation summary background: it was reported that on an unknown date during routine incoming inspection, the handle with quick coupling was broken.There was no patient involvement.Relevant actions have been taken to address the issue.This complaint involves one (1) device.Investigation flow: damage.Visual inspection: handle with quick coupling, small was received at us cq.Upon visual inspection at cq, it is observed that the handle has a vertical crack on the handle.The crack was across the location of the dowel pin.The instrument/handle was not separated into two pieces.No other issues were identified with the returned components of the device.The device failure/defect of cracked handle was identified during investigation and is related to the reported complaint condition of broken.Dimensional inspection: a dimensional inspection was not performed during this investigation as the root cause of the device condition has been identified as a device design deficiency.Document/specification review: drawings were reviewed during the investigation: investigation conclusion: the reported complaint condition of broken is confirmed for the handle with quick coupling, small as the instrument was received with a vertical crack on the handle.A valid design defect was identified as the root cause of the cracked condition.Relevant actions have been taken to address the issue.No manufacturing issues were identified through the investigation.A corrective and/or preventative action has already been launched and completed to address the design deficiency.Based upon these findings, no additional corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|