Literature article entitled, ¿clinical and radiological evaluation of revision hip arthroplasty using the cement-in-cement technique¿ by k.Goto, et al, published by the journal of bone and joint surgery (2008), vol.90-b, pp.1013-1018, was reviewed for mdr reportability.The purpose of this article is to review the efficacy of cementing femoral components in patients who were revised for aseptic loosening.Of the patients within this study, 26 with charnley stems were revised for aseptic loosening and implanted with competitor stems cemented with depuy cmw or endurance bone cement.Intra- and postoperatively, there were no complications associated with the depuy cement.Post-operatively, there were no complications related to the depuy cement.There was radiographic evidence of radiolucencies, but there were not confirmed intraoperatively.There was one revision of a cemented competitor stem for osteolysis.The femoral and acetabular components used within this study are competitor products.The complaint reports 26 revised charnley stems for loosening and 1 revision of depuy cement for osteolysis.The authors do not assign harms to specific patients with in the text.
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary = > no device was received.Root cause undetermined.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|