According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic diaphragm procedure, upon suturing the diaphragm, the device's needle snapped in half.Half of the needle fell into the patient's cavity.An x-ray was performed last (b)(6) 2019, but the needle was not found and not retrieved.The surgical time was extended 30 minutes or more due to the product problem, they had to look for half of the needle.A new suture was used to complete the case.
|
Additional information: g4, h3, h6.H3 evaluation summary: post market vigilance (pmv) led an evaluation of one device.The visual inspection of the returned product noted no shearing of the toggle switches.The center rod and plat pin were also found to be in undamaged and in the correct orientation.A small mark was noted in the bevel walls on the right side of the instrument.The jaws of the instrument were measured and found to be within specifications.The instrument was loaded with a needle and applied to test media for functional testing.The instrument was found to unload, load, and toggle without issue.The needle remained intact throughout testing.A review of the device history record indicates this product was released meeting all quality release specifications at the time of manufacture.The investigation concluded there were no abnormalities that would have caused or contributed to the reported condition.Additionally, the investigation detected a unreported condition of marks on the bevel walls that has no relationship to the reported condition.This condition may be caused by misloading of the needle, which could scratch the bevel walls of the instrument.No further actions have been deemed necessary at this time.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|