• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION CAROTID WALLSTENT; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION CAROTID WALLSTENT; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Model Number 26605
Device Problems Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Difficult to Advance (2920)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/14/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr.: device was returned for analysis.A visual and microscopic examination was performed on the returned device.The device was returned with the deployment handle fully pushed forward.A visual and tactile examination identified a complete break in the outer shaft of the device approximately 1190mm distal to the t connector.Multiple severe kinks were also noted on the inner shaft of the device.This outer shaft break prevented deployment and of the stent as the inner shaft could not be pushed forward to allow for deployment.No issues were noted with the catheter that could have contributed to the damage identified.The damage identified is consistent with excessive force being applied to the delivery system.A visual and microscopic examination was performed on the tip and markerbands of the device.No damage or any issues were noted that could have contributed to the complaint incident.The stent was returned fully mounted onto the delivery system.A visual and microscopic examination of the crimped stent identified no stent damage.Due to the condition of the returned device the stent could not be deployed.No issues were noted with the stent that could have contributed to the complaint incident.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.
 
Event Description
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 25-sep-2019.It was reported that advancing difficulties were encountered and stent deployment failure occurred.The target lesion was located in the right internal carotid artery.After a 190 cm filterwire ez was positioned, pre-dilatation was performed with a balloon.A 10.0-37 carotid wallstent was advanced but failed to pass through the lesion.The wire sheath of the filterwire was bent as the shuttle sheath was pulled towards the aorta.After that, the carotid stent passed through the lesion with difficulty but could not be deployed.The device was removed and the procedure was then completed with a 9-40 carotid wallstent.No patient complications were reported.However, returned device analysis revealed shaft detachment.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAROTID WALLSTENT
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
ballybrit business park
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
jay johnson
two scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634942574
MDR Report Key9180317
MDR Text Key163158447
Report Number2134265-2019-12238
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/10/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number26605
Device Catalogue Number26605
Device Lot Number0024046747
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/12/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/25/2019
Initial Date FDA Received10/11/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/02/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age82 YR
-
-