This report is for an unknown.Part and lot number are unknown.Without the specific part number; the udi number and 510-k number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Concomitant medical products: unknown.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: seo, ss., et al.(2011) "acl reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendon: comparison of short term clinical results between rigid-fix and pinn-acl cross pin", knee surgery & related research, vol.23, no.4, pages 208-212 (korea).This study emphasizes on comparing the short term clinical results of anterior cruciate ligament (acl) reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendon between rigid-fix and pinn-acl cross pin for femoral side fixation.The patients evaluated on course of this study: 127 patients who underwent arthroscopic acl reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendon and had been followed-up for over than one year were enrolled for the present study.Rigid-fix was used in 71 cases (group 1), and pinn-acl cross pin was used in 56 cases (group 2).Clinical and radiological results, operation time, and perioperative complications were compared amongst the two groups.The international knee documentation committee subjective score and lysholm score were 94 and 95 in group 1 and 87 and 91 in group 2, with no statistical difference (p=0.892, p=0.833), respectively.However, significant difference was observed in one-leg hop test between the two groups (p=0,032).Five cases in group 1 and 40 cases in group 2 were found to be associated with perioperative complications with statistical difference (p<0.0001).The article describes the following procedure: anterior cruciate ligament (acl) reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendon.The devices involved were: rigidfix (mitek, norwood, ma, usa), intrafix (mitek, norwood, ma, usa) and a cancellous suspension device, pinn-acl cross pin.Complications mentioned in the article were: regarding the complications, the incidence of cross pin-femoral tunnel mismatch was higher in group ii, with 4 cases in group i and 36 cases in group ii (p=0.017).Soft tissue irritation from cross pin head prominence was observed in 1 case in group i and 4 cases in group ii, which further improved 2 months later in all the cases.
|