A customer in (b)(6) notified biomérieux of a misidentification result when testing an isolate from an already deceased patient using the vitek® ms instrument (reference 410895, serial (b)(4).The customer reported the vitek ms identified the isolate as clostridium perfringens.Offline test results for this isolate confirmed it was a catalase positive, gram positive diphtheroid that did not grow anaerobically.The clostridium perfringens identification result was not consistent with the offline test results.The customer also tested the isolate using bruker® maldi-tof, which did not identify the isolate.There is no adverse patient impact.The customer confirmed the patient was deceased prior to sample collection and testing.This sample testing was requested by a medical examiner trying to determine cause of death.Biomérieux will initiate in internal investigation.
|
This report was initially submitted following notification from a customer in canada regarding a misidentification result when testing an isolate from an already deceased patient using the vitek® ms instrument (reference 410895, serial (b)(4)).The customer reported the vitek ms identified the isolate as clostridium perfringens.Biomérieux internal investigation was conducted.The strain was no longer available for submittal.Evaluation of test data submitted by the customer showed the calibrator "all peaks" values are very heterogeneous.This could be explained by a non-optimal spot preparation of the calibrator strain (culture, spot, different operator).This can be extrapolated to the sample spot preparation.In addition, the fine tuning was non-optimal, one mandatory criteria was not achieved (median of number of peaks was under the minimum value) and the "median of maximum resolution" (593) was below the acceptable value (650).Regarding the complaint description, the expected organism identification is unknown.To confirm the identification, sequencing has to be performed as the reference method.However, the strain is no longer available to perform furthers investigation.The investigation concluded that the probable root causes of the misidentification, based on test data analysis, are: non optimal fine tuning.Non optimal spot preparation.Without submittal of the patient strain, no further investigation is possible.
|