Model Number MODEL 100 |
Device Problems
Material Integrity Problem (2978); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 09/27/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported complaint of the lifeband (lot # 88573) broke was confirmed during the visual inspection of the returned lifeband.The probable root cause for the broken lifeband could be due to latent material defect.Upon visual inspection, observed the lifeband's spreader-link got detached from the belt, thus confirming the reported complaint.Historical complaints were reviewed for information related to the reported complaint and there was no previous history of complaint reported for lifeband with lot # 88573.
|
|
Event Description
|
The autopulse lifeband broke during first compression.The reporter was unable to specify if the issue occurred during shift check or patient use.No known impact or patient consequence was reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
On 25 oct 2019 we received additional information from the reporter, during patient use, the autopulse lifeband broke after first compression.Return of spontaneous circulation (rosc) was achieved and patient was transported to the hospital.Later at the hospital the patient expired.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The death was not related to the autopulse device.The autopulse is used as an adjunct to manual cpr in cases of clinical death.The benefit of using the autopulse is that it in part substitutes mechanical compressions for the physical labor of manual chest compressions.If the autopulse did not start or unexpectedly stops compressions, rescuer should revert to manual cpr, which is the standard of care.The autopulse was intended to be used as an adjunct to manual cpr on adult patients.In case of stoppage of autopulse the trained user reverts to manual cpr.The transition from autopulse to manual cpr by trained users is similar to the time necessary for rescuer rotation, and presents the same workflow as manual cpr.Hence, based on available information, the patients' outcome was not negatively impacted by the interruptions when compared to standard of care manual cpr.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|