"literature article entitled, ¿ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenotomy for the treatment of iliopsoas impingement: a description of technique and case study¿ by matthew j.Sampson, et al, published by journal of imaging and radiation oncology (2015), vol.59, pp.195-199, was reviewed for mdr reportability.This article describes an alternative ultrasound-guided percutaneous technique, achieving iliopsoas tenotomy utilizing a modified 18g coaxial needle and thus minimizing the morbidity and cost associated with an open or arthroscopic procedure.This method proved successful with resultant complete resolution of patient symptoms.This article is a case report of one such procedure.A male patient age (b)(6) who was experiencing symptoms of iliopsoas impingement post right thr (corail pinnacle; polyethylene/metal) for osteoarthritis.Seven months post thr, the patient reported worsening right groin pain that was incapacitating, ranging from 8/10 to 10/10 in severity.Physical examination demonstrated groin tenderness and reproduction of symptoms upon stressing the iliopsoas tendon consistent with impingement.Ultrasound demonstrated a thickened iliopsoas tendon and bursa with focal tenderness on transducer pressure.An ultrasound-guided iliopsoas bursal injection of 2 ml steroid and 3 ml 0.75% ropivacaine resulted in partial relief of symptoms for approximately 3 weeks.Upon relapse of symptoms, the decision was made to proceed to iliopsoas tenotomy via guided ultrasound under anesthesia.The cup and stem were well-fixed and in proper position.The surgeons decided to perform the tenotomy because there was no need to revise the implanted tha.The procedure was successful and at 9 weeks follow-up, the patient had complete resolution of pain and joint movement impairment.Captured in this complaint: 1 pinnacle cup and 1 corail stem.".
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary = > no device was received.Root cause undetermined.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.The complaint shall be closed with an undetermined conclusion; entered into the complaints database and monitored through trend analysis.Post market surveillance is per (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|