Model Number M00535150 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 10/11/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The complainant was unable to report the lot number; therefore the manufacture date and expiration date are unknown.(b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a stonetome was used in the papilla during an endoscopic sphincterotomy (est) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the cutting wire broke.The procedure was completed with a second stonetome.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a stonetome was used in the papilla during an endoscopic sphincterotomy (est) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the cutting wire broke.The procedure was completed with a second stonetome.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The complainant was unable to report the lot number; therefore the manufacture date and expiration date are unknown.(device codes): the problem code 1069 captures the reportable event of cutting wire broken.Visual examination of the returned device revealed that the cutting wire was broken, bent and blackened, which directly affected the functionality and integrity of the device.The complaint was consistent with the reported event of cutting wire broke.It is most probable that a peak of voltage could have caused the failures found in the device or if the device was not in contact with the tissue when it was energized.Therefore, the event is classified as adverse event related to procedure because of the adverse event occurred during the procedure and the device had no influence on event.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and confirmed that this device met all material, assembly and performance specifications at the time of release to distribution.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|