It was reported an unknown patient required a wittich nitinol stone basket to remove a biliary stone.After the device secured the stone, it was pulled towards the sheath.Per the initial report, "the product was disconnected while pulling the basket." additional intervention was required to recover the separated parts.No other adverse effects were reported for this incident.Additional information regarding event details has been requested but is unavailable at the time of this report.
|
D10: product received on: 04dec2019.Investigation / evaluation: (b)(6) from (b)(6) hosp.Informed cook of an incident involving a wittich nitinol stone basket.On (b)(6) 2019, during a biliary stone removal procedure the physician grabbed the stone and pulled it towards the sheath.The product was disconnected while pulling the basket.No resistance was felt during insertion or removal of any of the components.No additional procedures were performed; the fractured portion was recovered during the original procedure.The procedure was terminated and there was no follow-up with the patient.A review of the complaint history, device history record, drawing, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, quality control, and specifications of the device, as well as a visual inspection and dimensional verification, were conducted during the investigation.The complainant returned one damaged wittich nitinol stone basket to cook for investigation.Physical examination of the returned device showed separation at the notched cannula that connects the basket assembly to the stylet wire.No other surface damage was present.Additionally, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.The risks associated with these devices are acceptable when weighed against the benefits.Sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The device history record (dhr) for complaint lot revealed reported nonconformances.Three of the non-conformances were determined to be related to this issue.All non-conformances were either reworked or scrapped.A database search revealed no other complaints have been reported for the device lot.There is no evidence the device was not manufactured to specification, or that there are nonconforming devices in house or out in the field.The device instructions for use (ifu) was reviewed.It warns, ¿upon removal from the package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ it is possible if there is too much stress on the wire, this may have caused the wire to separate.However, based on the information provided, returned product and the results of the investigation, it was concluded a component failure without a manufacturing or design defect contributed to the failure mode.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|