• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES; TISSUE, HEART-VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES; TISSUE, HEART-VALVE Back to Search Results
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Arrhythmia (1721); Complete Heart Block (2627)
Event Date 12/01/2012
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Peri-procedural arrhythmias, heart block, and other conduction disturbances are common in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease and/or conduction abnormalities.They can be exacerbated with standard perioperative medications, anesthesia, and/or instrumentation of the heart.Temporary pacemakers are inserted in all patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (avr).It is not uncommon for patients to have short term/reversible periods of heart block or arrhythmias following the procedure while their heart recovers from cardiopulmonary bypass.In many cases, the temporary pm is left in the patient for a short time following the procedure and then subsequently removed prior to discharge.Following surgical aortic valve replacement (avr), new-onset bundle branch block has been reported in 16% to 32% of patients and the need for permanent pacemakers in 3% to 8% of patients.The reason for post-operative av block after surgical avr is related to injury to the cardiac conduction system during surgical excision of the adjacent diseased valve and annular tissue.The close anatomical relationship between the aortic valvular complex and the branching atrioventricular bundle explains the possible development of conduction abnormalities following prosthetic aortic valve procedures.(ref: (b)(4)) arrhythmias and conduction disturbances are also common after surgical repair or replacement of the tricuspid and mitral valves due to the proximity of the conduction pathways.  the device was not returned for evaluation, as it remains implanted.The root cause of the reported event cannot be conclusively determined; however, it appears that this event was likely due to patient and/or procedural related factors.The device history record (dhr) was not able to be reviewed as the device serial number was not provided.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
Through review of medical article "early outcomes with rapid-deployment vs stented biological valves: a propensity-match analysis" authors michel carrier, et al it was learnt about a propensity-matched study aimed to compare clinical and echographic outcomes between patients undergoing rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement (rdavr) compared with stented biological aortic valve replacement (savr), with or without concomitant procedures.Between 2012 and 2015, 61 consecutive patients (age 70 ± 7 years, european system for cardiac operative risk evaluation [euroscore] ii 2.1%) underwent aortic valve replacement with intuity prosthesis (edwards, (b)(4)) at the montreal heart institute within the context of this article the following events occurred perioperatively were identified as pertaining to the edwards intuity valves: one case of av block complete requiring implantation of permanent pacemaker.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reference capa-20-00141.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
TISSUE, HEART-VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
MDR Report Key9331552
MDR Text Key168225076
Report Number2015691-2019-04267
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/21/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/15/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/23/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-