• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number ESS305
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Biocompatibility (2886); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Uterine Perforation (2121); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This spontaneous case was reported by a lawyer and describes the occurrence of medical device removal ('failed reversal and subsequent surgeries') in a female patient who had essure inserted.On an unknown date, the patient had essure inserted.On an unknown date, the patient underwent medical device removal (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required).The patient was treated with surgery.At the time of the report, the medical device removal outcome was unknown.The reporter considered medical device removal to be related to essure.No lot number or device sample was received in this case.At this time, we have no information suggesting that the device failed to meet its specifications.We will conduct a review of our complaint records and other non-conformances data; should any new and reportable information become available from our investigation, this will be provided in a supplementary report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This spontaneous case was reported by a lawyer and describes the occurrence of medical device removal ('failed reversal and subsequent surgeries') in a female patient who had essure inserted.On an unknown date, the patient had essure inserted.On an unknown date, the patient underwent medical device removal (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required).The patient was treated with surgery.At the time of the report, the medical device removal outcome was unknown.The reporter considered medical device removal to be related to essure.Quality-safety evaluation of ptc: unable to confirm complaint.Most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on 3-dec-2019: quality-safety evaluation of product technical complaint.No lot number or device sample was received in this case.At this time, we have no information suggesting that the device failed to meet its specifications.We will conduct a review of our complaint records and other non-conformances data; should any new and reportable information become available from our investigation, this will be provided in a supplementary report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This spontaneous case was reported by a lawyer and describes the occurrence of medical device removal ('failed reversal and subsequent surgeries') in a female patient who had essure inserted.The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.On an unknown date, the patient had essure inserted.On an unknown date, the patient underwent medical device removal (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required) and experienced allergy to metals ("nickel allergies").The patient was treated with surgery (essure removal).At the time of the report, the medical device removal and allergy to metals outcome was unknown.The reporter considered allergy to metals and medical device removal to be related to essure.Concerning the injuries reported in this case, the following one was reported via social media: allergy to metals.Quality-safety evaluation of ptc: unable to confirm complaint.Most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on 20-mar-2020: social media received- new event nickel allergies was added.Reporter information was added.Based on the available information, a review of our complaint records and other relevant data will be conducted; any new and reportable information that becomes available from our investigation will be provided in a supplementary report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This spontaneous case was reported by a lawyer and describes the occurrence of medical device removal ('failed reversal and subsequent surgeries') in a female patient who had essure inserted.The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.On an unknown date, the patient had essure inserted.On an unknown date, the patient underwent medical device removal (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required) and experienced allergy to metals ("nickel allergies").The patient was treated with surgery (essure removal).At the time of the report, the medical device removal and allergy to metals outcome was unknown.The reporter considered allergy to metals and medical device removal to be related to essure.Concerning the injuries reported in this case, the following one was reported via social media: allergy to metals.Quality-safety evaluation of ptc: unable to confirm complaint.Most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on (b)(6) 2020: quality-safety evaluation of ptc.Based on the available information, a review of our complaint records and other relevant data was conducted; any new and reportable information that becomes available from our investigation will be provided in a supplementary report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This spontaneous case was reported by a lawyer and describes the occurrence of embedded device ('essure is embedded in my uterus') in a female patient who had essure inserted.The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.On an unknown date, the patient had essure inserted.On an unknown date, the patient experienced embedded device (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required), allergy to metals ("nickel allergies") and amenorrhoea ("my cycle stopped").The patient was treated with surgery (essure removal).At the time of the report, the embedded device, allergy to metals and amenorrhoea outcome was unknown.The reporter considered allergy to metals, amenorrhoea and embedded device to be related to essure.Concerning the injuries reported in this case, the following one was reported via social media: allergy to metals.Quality-safety evaluation of ptc: unable to confirm complaint.Most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on 18-jun-2020: social media received: reporter was added.Medical device removal was updated with device embedded and one new event-amenorrhea was added.Based on the available information, a review of our complaint records and other relevant data will be conducted; any new and reportable information that becomes available from our investigation will be provided in a supplementary report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ESSURE
Type of Device
TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, 13353
GM  13353
MDR Report Key9388255
MDR Text Key168463528
Report Number2951250-2019-11806
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HHS
UDI-Device Identifier10888853003051
UDI-Public(01)10888853003051
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P020014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/06/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/28/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberESS305
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/18/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-