Additional info: d10, d11, e2, e3, g7, g9, h2, h3, h6, h10 results of investigation: it was reported that a revision surgery was performed, due to sinking of the hip.The ball head (75004173) and the liner were exchanged.The surgeon stated that the patient suffered from a leg shortening.The ball head was revised with no further complications.The ex-planted device, used in treatment, was not returned for investigation.The production documentation as well as the complaint history review for the batch in scope did not show any deviations.Leg shortening is a known risk factor, mentioned in the instruction for use (lit.No.12.23, ed.05/16).Based on the received medical documents a medical assessment was conducted.The surgery report of the ball head revision did not indicate any inconsistencies related to the surgical technique.The risk of a unspecified post-operative condition is covered through our risk management.The investigation cannot conclude a root cause for the reported "sinking of the stem".With the information provided, the failure mode cannot be confirmed and the root cause stays undetermined after investigation.The failure mode and the device cannot be linked, as we did not receive the device for investigation.There are no indications that the implant failed to meet specifications at the time of manufacturing.Therefore, no further actions are deemed necessary at this point of the investigation.Smith and nephew will monitor the device for further similar issues.
|