• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NIHON KOHDEN CORPORATION CNS-6201A; CENTRAL MONITOR SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NIHON KOHDEN CORPORATION CNS-6201A; CENTRAL MONITOR SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number CNS-6201A
Device Problems Use of Device Problem (1670); Defective Component (2292)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/08/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The customer reported that their aten video splitter stopped functioning.The customer bypassed the aten video splitter to get their main monitor to work, but the remote display in the icu was down.The aten box would not power back on.There was likely a brief interruption in patient monitoring during the event when the customer had to disconnect the monitor from the aten device to plug it in directly to the central nurses' station (cns).The cns was monitoring bedside monitors (bsms) and transmitters.Nihon kohden technical service provided the customer with the part information so that she could order another aten from customer service.No patient harm or injury occurred when the displays went out.Nihon kohden continues to investigate the reported event.Nihon kohden will submit a supplemental report in accordance with 21 cfr section 803.56 when additional information becomes available.Concomitant medical device: the following devices were used in conjunction with the cns and are the devices that did not experience the failure.Bsm devices: model #: ni, sn #: ni, approximate age of the device: ni, device manufacturer date: ni, unique identifier (udi) #: ni.Transmitters: model #: ni, sn #: ni, approximate age of the device: ni, device manufacturer date: ni, unique identifier (udi) #: ni.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that their aten video splitter stopped functioning.The customer bypassed the aten video splitter to get their main monitor to work, but the remote display in the icu was down.The aten box would not power back on.There was likely a brief interruption in patient monitoring during the event when the customer had to disconnect the monitor from the aten device to plug it in directly to the central nurses' station (cns).
 
Event Description
The customer reported that their aten video splitter stopped functioning.The customer bypassed the aten video splitter to get their main monitor to work, but the remote display in the icu was down.The aten box would not power back on.There was likely a brief interruption in patient monitoring during the event when the customer had to disconnect the monitor from the aten device to plug it in directly to the central nurses' station (cns).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Details of complaint: the customer reported that the aten video splitter stopped functioning.The customer bypassed the aten video splitter to get the central nurse's station (cns) main monitor to work, but the remote display in the icu was down.The aten box would not power back on.There was likely a brief interruption in patient monitoring during the event when the customer had to disconnect the monitor from the aten device to plug it in directly to the central nurses' station (cns).The cns was monitoring bedside monitors (bsms) and transmitters.Nihon kohden technical service provided the customer with the part for a replacement aten video splitter.No patient harm was reported.Service requested / performed: troubleshooting.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for physical evaluation and functional analysis.The loss of video at the cns was attributed to a failing video splitter.The splitter was not returned for evaluation and as such, the root cause for its failure could not be determined.Due the age of the device, it is possible that the failure was caused by normal wear and tear.It is also possible that the splitter had become damaged due to user mishandling.The splitter is a third-party component.As this issue has an overall risk score of medium, a capa is not required per corrective action and preventive action process, sop07-003.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CNS-6201A
Type of Device
CENTRAL MONITOR SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
NIHON KOHDEN CORPORATION
attn: shama mooman
1-31-4 nishiochia
shinjuku-ku, tokyo 161-8 560
JA  161-8560
MDR Report Key9419822
MDR Text Key194963674
Report Number8030229-2019-00699
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MHX
UDI-Device Identifier04931921114131
UDI-Public04931921114131
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K102376
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/05/2019,10/20/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/05/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberCNS-6201A
Device Catalogue NumberPU-621RA
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA12/05/2019
Distributor Facility Aware Date11/08/2019
Device Age54 MO
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer12/05/2019
Date Manufacturer Received09/30/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
BSM DEVICES; BSM DEVICES; TRANSMITTERS; TRANSMITTERS
-
-