• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US UNKNOWN HIP FEMORAL STEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US UNKNOWN HIP FEMORAL STEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK HIP FEMORAL STEM
Device Problems Loss of Osseointegration (2408); Osseointegration Problem (3003); Migration (4003)
Patient Problems Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 11/21/2011
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The literature article entitled, "femoral stem fracture and in vivo corrosion of retrieved modular femoral hips" written by j.Caitlin huot carlson, ms, douglas w.Van citters, phd, john h.Currier, ms, amber m.Bryant, be, michael b.Mayor, md, and john p.Collier, de published by the journal of arthroplasty vol.27 no.7 2012 accepted by publisher 21 november 2011 was reviewed.The article's purpose was to report on retrieved modular femoral stems and inspect for corrosion.All stems were srom stems.Article reports that femoral heads were ceramic or metal.Liners may have been metal, ceramic or poly and the cups are not identified but assumed to be depuy implants.Inspection revealed that most stems had some degree of 'fretting' or corrosion at modular junctions including stem and sleeve interface or (and) stem and head junction.However the article does not quantify the findings to modular junction locations in order to determine accurate quantities.Table 1 provided further detail of reasons stems were explanted.Each case is captured individually for reason of revision and any information provided in the table and article in linked complaints.This complaint captures case no 3 that received revision when the stem was explanted at 2.3 months post initial implant for reason of subsidence and loose stem.The patient¿s age was (b)(6) and gender identity female.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary
=
> no device associated with this report was received for examination.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed, and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN HIP FEMORAL STEM
Type of Device
HIP FEMORAL STEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw IN 46581 0988
Manufacturer (Section G)
JTE WARSAW MFG SITE
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
1210 ward avenue
west chester, PA 19380-0988
6103142063
MDR Report Key9443854
MDR Text Key185227921
Report Number1818910-2019-121863
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KXA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,literatur
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/17/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/10/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK HIP FEMORAL STEM
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/08/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
-
-