|
Model Number M00535150 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 11/13/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Although the suspect device has been received, the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a stonetome was used in the papilla during a papillatomy procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the stonetome was placed on the papilla, the cutting wire was energize twice and was able to incise the papilla without any problem, but on the third time the cutting wire failed to energize.When it was checked under endoscope, it was found that the cutting wire broke.The procedure was completed with an olympus clevercut.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a stonetome was used in the papilla during a papillatomy procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the stonetome was placed on the papilla, the cutting wire was energize twice and was able to incise the papilla without any problem, but on the third time the cutting wire failed to energize.When it was checked under endoscope, it was found that the cutting wire broke.The procedure was completed with an olympus clevercut.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block h6 (device codes): the problem code 1069 captures the reportable event of cutting wire broken.Block h10: visual examination of the returned device revealed that the cutting wire was broken, bent and blackened.There was no other issue noted.The complaint was consistent with the reported event of cutting wire broke.It is most likely that a peak of voltage could have caused the failures noted or if the device was not in contact with the tissue when it was energized.Therefore, the most probable cause of this complaint is adverse event related to procedure since it is the most likely that the adverse event occurred during the procedure and the device had no influence on event.A dhr (device history record) review was performed and no anomalies were observed.It was confirmed that the device met all manufacturing specifications.A labeling review was performed and from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu)/product label.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|