• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US ARTHRO CLEVERHOOK-LEFT *EA; SKIN/TISSUE HOOK

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US ARTHRO CLEVERHOOK-LEFT *EA; SKIN/TISSUE HOOK Back to Search Results
Model Number 214641
Device Problems Difficult to Open or Close (2921); Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/26/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint #: (b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Udi: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported by the affiliate via cst that during a rotator cuff repair the jaw of the arthro cleverhook-left was not opening as it should and the opening mechanism is slightly bent.The procedure was completed using the same device.No patient consequences or surgical delay reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary
=
> the complaint device is not being returned, multiples attempts for product return were made with no response, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.This complaint cannot be confirmed.Given that a not lot number was provided, a manufacturing record evaluation (mre) review cannot be performed.If the lot number becomes available, the mre review will be performed.Since the complaint device was not returned, we cannot determine a root cause for the reported failure.If the device is received in the future, we will reopen the complaint and perform the investigation as appropriate.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Correction: d4, the lot number and expiration date have been updated to reflect the correct information.Therefore, udi: (b)(4).Investigation summary: according to the information provided, it was reported that during a rotator cuff repair the jaw of the arthro cleverhook-left was not opening as it should and the opening mechanism is slightly bent.The complaint device was received and evaluated.Visual observations reveals marks of wear in the shaft.The functional test presented difficulties operating the device as there was resistance when trying to close and open the jaws.The lower jaw was loose and only move as manually; besides, it was slightly bent.Therefore, the complaint was confirmed.The possible root cause for the reported failure can be associated for the excessive use of the device over the time which would eventually lead to jaws failure.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.As a potential cause cannot be associated to manufacturing, therefore a manufacturing record evaluation is not required.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d10, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
SKIN/TISSUE HOOK
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
MDR Report Key9460040
MDR Text Key203538576
Report Number1221934-2019-59942
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NBH
UDI-Device Identifier10886705004225
UDI-Public10886705004225
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/26/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2022
Device Model Number214641
Device Catalogue Number214641
Device Lot Number12D02
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/15/2020
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/26/2019
Initial Date FDA Received12/12/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/27/2020
07/15/2020
07/21/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/29/2020
07/16/2020
07/23/2020
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-