• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. ULTRACISION HARMONIC ACE (EXACT CODE UNKNOWN); INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. ULTRACISION HARMONIC ACE (EXACT CODE UNKNOWN); INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ACEXXX
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Burn(s) (1757); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Nerve Damage (1979); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Batch # unk.Date of event: publication year for the journal article is 2010.This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the manufacturing records cannot be reviewed as the lot/batch number has not been provided.This complaint has been documented based on the information available within the article; however, due to the age of the journal article, additional event details will not be pursued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during review of journal article, title: minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: experience of 300 cases.Author/s: youben fan, bomin guo, shunli guo, jie kang, bo wu, pin zhang, qi zheng.Citation: surg endosc (2010) 24:2393¿2400; doi 10.1007/s00464-010-0960-y.This study aimed to summarize the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (mivat).From february 2005 to august 2008, a total of 300 patients (n=36 male n=264 female, mean age: 54.6 years, range: 23-71 years) underwent mivat using a single central incision with an average length of 2 cm (range = 1.5¿3 cm), about 2 cm above the sternal notch.Small conventional retractors and dissectors, ultrasonic scalpel (ethicon), 5-mm laparoscope, and a video screen were the instruments used.The ultrasonic scalpel (ethicon) was used to dissect the middle thyroid vein and the upper and lower pole vessels.Also, under direct vision, the back of the thyroid lobe was dissected completely with the ultrasonic scalpel.If blood was still oozing from the residual thyroid tissues, ultrasonic scalpel or resorbable stitches were used for hemostasis.Complaints included massive hemorrhage from the vessels of the upper peduncle (n=1).This patient was converted to open surgery.Other operative complaints included permanent unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve (rln) palsy (n=5), transient unilateral rln palsy (n=7), superior laryngeal nerve (sln) injury (n=5), transient hypoparathyroidism (n=9), and mild skin burn from the ultrasonic scalpel (n=5).In conclusion, mivat appears to be safe and feasible in patients with benign thyroid nodules, with minimal injury and excellent cosmetic results.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ULTRACISION HARMONIC ACE (EXACT CODE UNKNOWN)
Type of Device
INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
6107428552
MDR Report Key9462325
MDR Text Key188396173
Report Number3005075853-2019-24246
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LFL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K051036
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/14/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/12/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberACEXXX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/14/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-