• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. LIGACLIP EXTRA TITANIUM CLIPS; CLIP, IMPLANTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. LIGACLIP EXTRA TITANIUM CLIPS; CLIP, IMPLANTABLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LTXXX
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hematoma (1884); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Batch # unk.Publication year of 2019.This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis.The lot/batch was not provided; therefore, a manufacturing record evaluation could not be performed.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information:   does the author/surgeon believe that the ethicon device caused or contributed to the patient complications mentioned in the article? if yes, please explain.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent. .
 
Event Description
It was reported that during review of a journal article, title: the use of plasmakinetic cautery compared to conventional electrocautery for dissection of abdominal free flap for breast reconstruction: single-centre, randomized controlled study.Author : whitney t.H.Chow, georgette oni, venkat v.Ramakrishnan, mat griffiths.Citation: gland surg 2019;8(3):242-248; doi: 10.21037/gs.2018.12.04.This prospective randomized blinded study aimed to investigate whether the use of the plasmakinetic cautery confers clinical benefits over conventional electrocautery diathermy in abdominal flap dissection during breast reconstruction.From january 2014 to november 2014, a total of 40 patients were blindly randomized to either ¿group 1- conventional electrocautery¿ (n=20, mean age: 55 years, mean bmi: 29 kg/m2) or ¿group 2-plasmakinetic cautery¿ (n=20, mean age: 54 years, mean bmi 27.9 kg/m2) with the ratio of 1:1, for the dissection of the abdominal free flap.During surgery, bleeding vessels were cauterized except for large perforating branches, which were clipped with ligaclips (ethicon).Vicryl mesh (ethicon) was routinely placed under the rectus sheath on closure.The closure of the abdominal wound in layers with 3/0 vircyl (ethicon) to the fascia, stratafix barbed sutures (ethicon) to dermis and dermbond topical skin adhesive (ethicon) for wound final approximation.Complaints included seroma formation (n=27) where 4, 14 and 9 seromas were detected at days 7, 14 and 42 post-operation respectively and only one seroma required drainage during their outpatient visit at 14 days post-operation.Other complaints are hematoma (n=3) which required further surgery to evacuate the hematoma, and suspected wound infection (n=1) who need antibiotics post-discharge.In conclusion, this study demonstrates that there are no significant differences between the use of plasmakinetic cautery and conventional electrocautery for abdominal free flap dissection.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LIGACLIP EXTRA TITANIUM CLIPS
Type of Device
CLIP, IMPLANTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
6107428552
MDR Report Key9491045
MDR Text Key188815262
Report Number3005075853-2019-24547
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FZP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/05/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/18/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberLTXXX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/05/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-