• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON DICKINSON AND CO. BD ULTRA-FINE¿ NANO¿ PEN NEEDLES 4MM (5/32¿) 32G; HYPODERMIC SINGLE LUMEN NEEDLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON DICKINSON AND CO. BD ULTRA-FINE¿ NANO¿ PEN NEEDLES 4MM (5/32¿) 32G; HYPODERMIC SINGLE LUMEN NEEDLE Back to Search Results
Model Number 2865
Device Problems Misconnection (1399); Failure to Deliver (2338)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/06/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event: unknown.The date received by manufacturer has been used for this field.Investigation summary: level b investigation - complaint evaluation / complaint history check for the event(s) that occurred.Severity: s_2__; occurrence: a complaint history check was performed and this is the 3rd related complaint for needle clog on lot # 8247891.Investigation summary: no samples (including photos) were returned therefore the complaint could not be confirmed and the root cause is undetermined.Complaints received for this device and reported condition will continue to be tracked and trended.If samples are received in the future the complaint will be reopened for further investigation.A lot history review was carried out and no related non conformance's were raised in association with this packaged lot concluding all inspections were performed per the applicable operations and met qc specifications.Investigation conclusion: based on the samples / photo(s) received the investigation concluded: unconfirmed: bd was not able to duplicate or confirm the customer¿s indicated failure as no samples or photos were returned.Complaints received for this device and reported condition will continue to be tracked and trended.Information will be captured on trend reports and monitored monthly.Our business team regularly reviews the collected data for identification of emerging trends.Root cause description: root cause cannot be determined at this time as the issue is unconfirmed as no samples or photos were returned.Rationale: based on the investigation, no additional investigation and no capa is required at this time.
 
Event Description
It has been reported that one bd ultra-fine¿ nano¿ pen needles 4mm (5/32¿) 32g has been found experiencing difficulty to operate during use.The following has been provided by the initial reporter: it was reported that the needle was blocked.Verbatim: needle blocked.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: sample received.New investigation completed.The following information has been updated: h.6.Investigation summary: level b investigation - complaint evaluation / complaint history check for the event(s) that occurred.Severity: s_2__; occurrence: a complaint history check was performed and this is the 3rd related complaint for needle clog on lot # 8247891.Investigation summary: customer returned one (1) used 32g x 4mm bd pen needle without a cover, tear drop label, or inner shield attached.Consumer reported needle blocked.The returned pen needle was examined, then tested for flow using a test pen injector: the returned pen needle was not able to expel properly.A wire test was then performed on this sample: the wire passed through the cannula, however, there was a small, clear residue observed at the tip of the wire after being through the cannula.Under the microscope the residue was identified as residual silicone from the manufacturing process.Investigation by the manufacturer (dun laoghaire) is not necessary as the silicone residue was already identified and removed from the sample.A lot history review was carried out and no related non conformances were raised in association with this packaged lot concluding all inspections were performed per the applicable operations and met qc specifications.Investigation conclusion: based on the samples and/or photo(s) received the investigation concluded: - confirmed: bd was able to duplicate or confirm the customer¿s indicated failure (clog) complaints received for this device and reported condition will continue to be tracked and trended.Information will be captured on trend reports and monitored monthly.Our business team regularly reviews the collected data for identification of emerging trends.Root cause description: the possible root cause for this issue: some residual silicone from the manufacturing lubrication process could be the cause for slight blockage of the flow.Rationale: based on the investigation, no additional investigation and no capa is required at this time.
 
Event Description
It has been reported that one bd ultra-fine¿ nano¿ pen needles 4mm (5/32¿) 32g has been found experiencing difficulty to operate during use.The following has been provided by the initial reporter: it was reported that the needle was blocked verbatim: ¿ needle blocked.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD ULTRA-FINE¿ NANO¿ PEN NEEDLES 4MM (5/32¿) 32G
Type of Device
HYPODERMIC SINGLE LUMEN NEEDLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON DICKINSON AND CO.
pottery road
dun laoghaire co
MDR Report Key9521641
MDR Text Key193660955
Report Number9616656-2019-01270
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FMI
UDI-Device Identifier10885403928659
UDI-Public10885403928659
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K162516
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/07/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/26/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date08/31/2023
Device Model Number2865
Device Catalogue Number320122
Device Lot Number8247891
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/02/2020
Date Manufacturer Received12/06/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-