SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD ACETLR CUP HAP 60MM W/ IMPTR; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 74120160 |
Device Problems
Noise, Audible (3273); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problems
Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); Discomfort (2330); Joint Dislocation (2374)
|
Event Date 06/13/2012 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported a left hip revision due to persistent pain and discomfort in his hips and heard it popping on numerous occasions.Head explanted.Stryker components implanted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision, the bhr cup, hemi head and modular sleeve were removed.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.A review of the complaint history for the bhr cup, hemi head and modular sleeve was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.No other similar complaints were identified for the head and cup.Similar complaints have been identified for the sleeve.However, as the device is no longer sold, no action is to be taken.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event and no further actions are required at this time.The available medical documents were reviewed.The reported pain, gray amorphous tissue and fluid may be consistent with findings consistent with metal debris; however, without the supporting lab/pathology results/ imaging and/or the analysis of the explanted components the root cause of the pain, gray amorphous tissue and fluid cannot be confirmed and it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.A review of the complaint history for the cup/ head / sleeve was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.No other complaints have been identified for the head.Similar complaints have been identified for the cup & this will continue to be monitored.Similar complaints have been identified for the sleeve.However, as this device is no longer sold, no action is to be taken.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.Device history record review confirmed that all released parts met specifications applicable at the time of production.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event and no further actions are required at this time.The available medical documents were reviewed.The reported pain, gray amorphous tissue and fluid may be consistent with findings consistent with metal debris; however, without the supporting lab/pathology results/ imaging and/or the analysis of the explanted components the root cause of the pain, gray amorphous tissue and fluid cannot be confirmed and it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.It was also noted that use of a competitor¿s (aesculap metha) stem was implanted with the bhr cup at the time of revision.This activity was performed contrary to the instructions for use of for bhr implants which states under its important medical information, ¿do not mix components from other manufacturers.¿ without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
New information: g4, d4.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|