The device has not yet been returned therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.If the device is returned and evaluation completed, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Device history record (dhr) review was conducted for the reported identification number.The lot was released meeting all qa specifications.
|
It was reported that during the procedure the physician completed an ablation and then visualized the patient cavity.Physician states he saw no ablation at the fundus region.Physician then re-inserted the same device to perform a "second burn" which also did not accomplish the appearance of a fundal burn.The physician "readily acknowledged that he knows that double burning is not indicated." physician then opened a second device to re-ablate.Physician did not indicate if the second device provided the burn he was seeking, but instead stated that upon removal and re-visualization of the cavity with hysteroscope, he saw 'gold colored mesh' left behind in the uterus.No known injury to patient.
|