Catalog Number BXAL085901J |
Device Problem
Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 11/27/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A review of the manufacturing records could not be conducted since the requested lot number is not available.As the devices were not returned, no evaluation of the devices could be performed.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2019, the patient underwent an endovascular procedure to repair occlusion of the right and left common iliac arteries.It was reported that the bilateral common iliac arteries were calcified.Three gore® viabahn® vbx balloon expandable endoprostheses were placed with covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (cerab) technique, one in the abdominal aorta, one in the right common iliac artery and one in the left common iliac artery.It was reported that gore® viabahn® vbx balloon expandable endoprosthesis in the right side was expanded to 8mm.The patient tolerated the procedure.On november 27, 2019, post-operative follow-up imaging revealed distal portion of gore® viabahn® vbx balloon expandable endoprosthesis in the right common iliac artery was reportedly compressed.On (b)(6) 2019, re-intervention was performed.It was confirmed that the diameter of the right common iliac artery was approximately 12mm-14mm.The gore® viabahn® vbx balloon expandable endoprosthesis in the right common iliac artery was reportedly expanded to 12mm using a 12mm armada pta balloon catheter.Intra-operative imaging showed adequate blood flow through the gore® viabahn® vbx balloon expandable endoprosthesis.It was reported the gore® viabahn® vbx balloon expandable endoprosthesis was suspected to have compressed due to external pressure.It was also reported that gore® viabahn® vbx balloon expandable endoprosthesis wasn¿t expanded to the diameter of the right common iliac artery during initial procedure.Reportedly, the physician suspected that may have contributed to the event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The engineering evaluation states the following: the referenced complaint did not have a returned device.The following evaluation is based on information obtained from the event description and communication summary.The complaint was for a compressed device.Crush resistance of the vbx device can be influenced by the stent ring material, stent ring geometry, stent ring spacing, and stent ring alignment.The stent rings are certified by the supplier for the material and geometric properties.Stent rings are 100% verified during the manufacturing process to be free of visual deformities.Stent ring geometry, spacing, and alignment are 100% verified during the manufacturing process.The device history file was reviewed and no anomalies were identified.Based on the device examination performed, no manufacturing anomalies were identified to which the event could be definitively attributed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Corrected h1.Type of reportable event (serious injury).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The referenced complaint did not have a returned device.The following evaluation is based on information obtained from the event description and communication summary.The complaint was for a compressed device.Crush resistance of the vbx device can be influenced by the stent ring material, stent ring geometry, stent ring spacing, and stent ring alignment.The stent rings are certified by the supplier for the material and geometric properties.Stent rings are 100% verified during the manufacturing process to be free of visual deformities.Stent ring geometry, spacing, and alignment are 100% verified during the manufacturing process.Based on the device examination performed, no manufacturing anomalies were identified to which the event could be definitively attributed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Corrected conclusion code 1: 61.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|