• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US CORDCUTTER *EA; SUTURE CUTTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US CORDCUTTER *EA; SUTURE CUTTER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 214646
Device Problem Dull, Blunt (2407)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/01/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the complaint device was received and inspected.Visually, the device appears worn indicating the device was used, but as expected condition and the laser markings are slightly faded.Under magnification, the distal end of the cutter has nicks and marks.When the trigger was tested, it feels rough as though the internal components are worn.When suture was loaded to test its functionality, it does not cut the suture cleanly.Therefore, the reported failure can be confirmed and attributed to fair wear and tear due to the age and use of the device.Hence, the potential cause for this issue is not related to manufacturing, therefore a manufacturing record evaluation is not required.At this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Udi: (b)(4).The lot number is unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the sales rep via cst that the cordcutter ea was prematurely cutting the #2 orthocord suture.Another device was used to complete the procedure.No patient consequences or surgical delay reported.Additional information received from the affiliate reported the free stand of the suture was attached to the #2 orthocord and the prematurely cut suture did not affect the case in any way.The affiliate reported this was not a suture or anchor issue, it was exclusively something wrong with the cord cutter and the surgeon was still able to use the prematurely cut suture.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
SUTURE CUTTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
6103142063
MDR Report Key9575276
MDR Text Key206786578
Report Number1221934-2020-00124
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FZT
UDI-Device Identifier10886705004270
UDI-Public10886705004270
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/09/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number214646
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/25/2019
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/09/2020
Initial Date FDA Received01/10/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-