It was reported that the patient was being referred for prophylactic battery replacement.After the replacement, the generator was sent back for product analysis to be performed.Product analysis (pa) was performed on the generator returned.The electrical tests performed in the pa lab found that the generator was at an ifi = no condition.The battery voltage was measured at 2.864 volts, and the memory locations on the generator indicated that 82.618% of the battery had been consumed.Contaminates were visualized on the trimmed edge so the generator was opened.The battery voltage was measured again at 2.904 volts, resulting in an ifi=no condition.The results from the postburn electrical test concluded that the contaminates observed contributed to the supply current conditions.The remaining residual material on the pcba edge after the ¿test tab¿ removal manufacturing process resulted in increased current consumption (out of speciation) for the pulsing mode of operation.The device history records of the generator was reviewed in which it was confirmed that all parameters passed inspection and that the trim test tab was performed which was prior to the manufacturing process being corrected; therefore, the generator of interest is part of the laser routing issue which would cause premature eos.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
|