|
Model Number CDP2207BP |
Device Problems
Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 12/26/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported that 1~2 minutes later after stent placement, it was confirmed that the stent migrated to the proximal side (about 1.5cm) under the scope image.It was confirmed from the device history record that device had been manufactured with no significant issue and passed all the inspections successfully.Migration can be occurred by other company's device as well as ours.It is affected by patient's lesion status, peristalsis of organs, and drug use in general.Based on the description, which was written that "the stenosis was already dilated due to the removed stent", it is assumed that the migration has occurred due to the patient's lesion status, however, it is hard to exactly investigate and analysis for this complaint since the suspected device was not returned and it is difficult to reconstruct the situation at the time of procedure with limited information.The suspected device is not registered in the us and there will be continued to monitor the same or similar customer complaints.
|
|
Event Description
|
There was a circumferential severe stenosis (about 2cm) at sigmoid colon.This stent was to be used for bts.The scope (pcf-q260) was inserted in front of the stenosis and gw (jagwire35inch) was inserted through the scope.The stent was carefully deployed so that the proximal flare part contacts to the stenosis.After the stent placement, the delivery system was carefully removed to avoid it from catching the stent moving.It was confirmed that the stenosis was in the middle of the stent under the fluoroscopic image.However, 1 or 2 minutes later, it was confirmed that the stent migrated to the proximal side (about 1.5cm) under the scope image.Then, it was confirmed that the distal flare part was within the stenosis part under the fluoroscopic image.Considering the stent end causes any complication like perforation, the physician determined to remove the stent because it could be removed right after the placement.As a result, no additional stent was placed because the stenosis was already dilated due to the removed stent and it could cause migration to additional stent again.The physician commented that the cause was unknown because there was no feeling of the stenosis being soft.The complaint product was discarded.There were no patient complications as a result of this event.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|