• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA CANADA CORP PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE; TISSUE HEART VALVES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA CANADA CORP PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE; TISSUE HEART VALVES Back to Search Results
Model Number PVS23
Device Problems Perivalvular Leak (1457); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem Heart Failure (2206)
Event Date 04/24/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Since the device remains implanted and given that the serial number is unknown, no investigation is possible at this time.Based on the information reported in the paper, it is reported that the perceval displacement may have been attributed to a combination of an initial mis-sizing of the device ('a larger perceval prosthesis would have been more suitable, as for manufacturer indications') and procedural factors ('the implantation technique itself could have favored the valve instability').Furthermore, based on the ct scan findings, the device appeared well expanded and shaped.Ultimately, since no device inspection was possible, the cause cannot be definitively stated.The manufacturer is following up to retrieve additional information on the event and, if received, a follow-up report will be provided.Device not explanted.
 
Event Description
The manufacturer was informed on this event through the recent publication 'perceval sutureless valve migration treated by valve-in-valve with a corevalve evolut pro' by a.Laricchia et al.The paper reports that a (b)(6) male patient received a perceval pvs23 through right mini-thoracotomy.Postoperatively, the patient progressively developed signs of heart failure and transesophageal echocardiography showed severe aortic regurgitation due to a para-valvular leak (pvl).A subsequent computed tomography (ct) scan revealed that the mechanism involved in pvl was a partial migration of the perceval prosthesis at the level of the noncoronary cusp.Due to the patient's comorbidities, the heart team excluded a second surgery and decided to perform a viv tavr with a corevalve evolut pro 29.The tavr was successfully performed, with trivial residual aortic regurgitation.The patient was discharged on the sixth postoperative day in good general conditions.No adverse events are reported at the 1-month follow-up visit.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Since the device remains implanted and given that the serial number is unknown, no investigation is possible at this time.Based on the information reported in the paper, possible contributing factors to the reported event were identified in an initial mis-sizing of the device ('a larger perceval prosthesis would have been more suitable, as for manufacturer indications') and procedural factors ('the implantation technique itself could have favored the valve instability').Ultimately, since no device inspection was possible, the cause cannot be definitively stated.
 
Event Description
The manufacturer was informed on this event through the recent publication 'perceval sutureless valve migration treated by valve-in-valve with a corevalve evolut pro' by a.Laricchia et al.The paper reports that a 73 years old male patient received a perceval pvs23 through right mini-thoracotomy on (b)(6) 2019.It is reported that the patient progressively developed signs of heart failure and transesophageal echocardiography showed severe aortic regurgitation due to a para-valvular leak (pvl).A subsequent computed tomography (ct) scan revealed that the mechanism involved in pvl was a partial migration of the perceval prosthesis at the level of the noncoronary cusp.Due to the patient's comorbidities, the heart team excluded a second surgery and decided to perform a viv tavr with a corevalve evolut pro 29.The tavr was successfully performed on (b)(6) 2019.The tavr was successfully performed, with trivial residual aortic regurgitation.The patient was discharged on the sixth postoperative day in good general conditions.No adverse events are reported at the 1-month follow-up visit.The paper also reports that the patient developed a third-degree atrioventricular block needing a permanent pacemaker on (b)(6) 2019 (submitted under mw 3004478276-2020-00118).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
TISSUE HEART VALVES
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA CANADA CORP
5005 north fraser way
burnaby, british columbia
MDR Report Key9707185
MDR Text Key179352996
Report Number3004478276-2020-00119
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P150011
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type literature
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/17/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/13/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberPVS23
Device Catalogue NumberICV1209
Device Lot NumberTBD
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/17/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age73 YR
-
-