Model Number 83779 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Entrapment of Device (1212); Premature Activation (1484); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problems
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Date 01/28/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Weight: (b)(6) kgs.Initial reporter city: (b)(6).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the coil separated from the middle part and remained inside patient.The target lesion was located in the bronchial artery.A 2mmx4cm interlock was selected for use.During the procedure, it as noted that the coil became stuck on the tip part of a non-bsc catheter and was removed.However, the coil separated at the middle part and was left inside patient from bronchial artery to aorta.The proximal side was removed protruding from the catheter's tip.There was no resistance upon retrieving the catheter and the coil and no possibility of adhesion of thrombus.No complications reported and the patient is stable.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A4.Weight- 67.5 kgs.E1.Initial reporter city: (b)(6).Initially reported h6 patient code description as device fragments in patient 3165 and device code description entrapment of device 1212.Corrected codes to no consequence or impact to patient 2199 and device code premature activation 1484.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the coil separated from the middle part and remained inside patient.The target lesion was located in the bronchial artery.A 2mmx4cm interlock was selected for use.During the procedure, it as noted that the coil became stuck on the tip part of a non-bsc catheter and was removed.However, the coil separated at the middle part and was left inside patient from bronchial artery to aorta.The proximal side was removed protruding from the catheter's tip.There was no resistance upon retrieving the catheter and the coil and no possibility of adhesion of thrombus.No complications reported and the patient is stable.It was further reported that the first coil that broke and detached within the patient was a 8cmx3mm interlock and the second coil was the 2mmx4cm interlock which prematurely deployed within the catheter and possibly tore within the catheter during removal.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the coil separated from the middle part and remained inside patient.The target lesion was located in the bronchial artery.A 2mmx4cm interlock was selected for use.During the procedure, it as noted that the coil became stuck on the tip part of a non-bsc catheter and was removed.However, the coil separated at the middle part and was left inside patient from bronchial artery to aorta.The proximal side was removed protruding from the catheter's tip.There was no resistance upon retrieving the catheter and the coil and no possibility of adhesion of thrombus.No complications reported and the patient is stable.It was further reported that the first coil that broke and detached within the patient was a 8cmx3mm interlock and the second coil was the 2mmx4cm interlock which prematurely deployed within the catheter and possibly tore within the catheter during removal.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A4.Weight- 67.5 kgs.E1.Initial reporter city: (b)(6).Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.A pusher wire and coil were returned for this complaint.The coil and pusher wire arms were not interlocked.The pusher wire was inspected and no issues was noted.The coil was inspected and it was noted kinked.No more damages were found in the returned device.Microscopic inspection of the pusher wire was performed and observed that the zap tip has a smooth surface.The interlocking arm was inspected and no anomalies were noted.Microscopic inspection of the main coil was performed and observed that the zap tip has a smooth surface.The interlocking arm was inspected and no anomalies were noted.Dimensional inspection of the pusher wire and main coil that could be measured were performed and were within specifications.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|