• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE VIABAHN ENDOPROSTHESIS; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE VIABAHN ENDOPROSTHESIS; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY Back to Search Results
Device Problems Partial Blockage (1065); Complete Blockage (1094); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problem Occlusion (1984)
Event Date 05/14/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional manufacturer narrative: review of the manufacturing records could not be performed as no lot number information was provided.The device(s) was not returned.Consequently, direct product analysis was not possible.Additional information about this event could not be obtained.As a result, no conclusion can be drawn.All information has been placed on file for use in tracking and trending.
 
Event Description
The following abstract was reviewed: "performance of viabahn balloon-expandable stent compared with self-expanding covered stents for fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair" (fernando motta, m.D.; frederico e.Parodi, m.D.; jason r.Crowner, m.D.; luigi pascarella, m.D.; katharine l.Mcginigle, m.D.; william a.Marston, m.D.; melina r.Kibbe, m.D.; mark a.Farber, m.D.; savs22; journal of vascular surgery, january 2020, volume 71, number 1; page e28 & e29.The objective of the physician sponsored investigational device exemption trial was to compare the performance between gore® viabahn® vbx balloon expandable endoprosthesis and self-expanding covered stents (gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis & fluency¿ plus endovascular stent graft) (ses) used as bridging stents for directional branches during fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair of complex aortic aneurysms.The median patient age was 71 with 70% male.Total number of vessels incorporated to repair was 977 of which 179 were branch vessels (54 celiac artery, 56 superior mesenteric artery, 38 right renal artery, and 31 left renal artery).Primary patency rates at 24 months for vbx was 98.1%, and,98.6 for ses.Freedom from endoleaks (vbx - 97.3, ses 98.6%), freedom from secondary intervention (vbx - 91.5%, ses 95%), and freedom branch instability (vbx - 95.5%, ses 97.3%).The abstract reports the vbx demonstrated excellent primary patency and similarly low rates of branch-related complications and endoleaks, with no branch-related aortic rupture or death.
 
Event Description
Reviewed was article titled, performance of viabahn balloon-expandable stent compared with self-expandable covered stents for branched endovascular aortic repair.Authors: fernando motta, md, f.Ezequiel parodi, md, martyn knowles, md, mba, jason r.Crowner, md, luigi pascarella, md, katharine l.Mcginigle, md, mph, william a.Marston, md, melina r.Kibbe, md, elad ohana, rt(r)(ci)(vi), and mark a.Farber, md, chapel hill, nc.Society for vascular surgery, vol 73 no.2.Accepted may 14, 2020.The study compares the performance between gore® viabahn® vbx balloon expandable endoprosthesis (vbx) and self-expanding covered stents ([ses] - gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis and fluency¿ plus endovascular stent graft) used as bridging stents for directional branches during fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair of complex aortic aneurysms.The study includes 62 patients and 177 branches that were incorporated into the fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repairs between july 2012 and june 2019.There was no branch-related rupture or mortality.Primary patency at 24 months (vbx, 98.1%; ses, 98.6%), freedom from endoleak (vbx, 95.6%; ses, 98.6%;), freedom from secondary intervention (vbx, 94.7%; ses, 98.1%), and freedom from branch instability (vbx, 95.6%; ses) were similar between groups.The median age of the patients treated with a branch was 68.5 years (63-75 years); 66% were male.Branch-related outcomes state at follow-up, two occlusions occurred at the celiac artery (ca), one was with a gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis and the other was a non-gore device.It was reported the occlusions were probably secondary to median arcuate ligament compression.The patients did not need reintervention because the patients were asymptomatic.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Article: performance of viabahn balloon-expandable stent compared with self-expandable covered stents for branched endovascular aortic repair.Society for vascular surgery.Https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Jvs.2020.05.028.Combination product: cbas® heparin surface manufacturer/compounder: w.L.Gore & associates, inc.Lot number: unk cbas® heparin surface incorporates cbas-heparin manufactured from heparin sodium api, which is covalently bound to the device surface and is essentially non-eluting.As a cross reference, mfr report #2017233-2020-00116 is associated with this same article.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE VIABAHN ENDOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
MDR Report Key9740626
MDR Text Key188246930
Report Number2017233-2020-00118
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P040037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/10/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received02/21/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/08/2020
03/22/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age69 YR
-
-