The lot number for the device was provided.The device history records are currently under review.The device has been returned for evaluation.The investigation is currently underway.(expiry date: 06/2021).The information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one 23cm glidepath catheter was returned in two segments for evaluation.Gross visual inspection, microscopic visual inspection and functional evaluations were performed.The investigation is inconclusive for the catheter falling out of the patient.Circumferential break was noted at approximately 21.1cm from the distal end of the y-body and both lumens on the distal catheter segment presented difficulty in infusion and would not aspirate.Although a definitive root cause could not be determined, inappropriate securement method, improper cuff retention, or excessive procedural forces could have potentially caused or contributed to the reported event.It is unknown whether patient and/or procedural factors contributed to the event.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) found that the product labeling was inadequate.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|