A search for non-conformance associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.An investigation was conducted on the returned device; the pusher and implant were found to be inside of the microcatheter.The pusher was returned inserted into the hub of the microcatheter in the incorrect direction and was stuck at the gold connector transition.The pusher was removed and reviewed for damage.Lead wire separation was noted through the proximal end of the pusher.The rest of the pusher, including the heater coil, was found to be in good condition and without damage.The implant was within the body of the microcatheter and was separated from the pusher.No signs of damage were noted on the returned catheter.There was dried blood and biomaterial in the microcatheter.The microcatheter was excised to expose the proximal end of the implant.Prior to extraction, it was noted that the implant was stretched at the proximal end.Pulling on the implant via the marker band, the implant was able to be removed.Friction was noted upon removal and lessened as areas with biomaterial exited the microcatheter.The monofilament was examined but was found to have an unidentifiable profile.However, the heater coil did not appear to have been activated using a detachment controller.The monofilament was examined and found to have an unidentifiable detachment profile.However, with the implant stretched and the heater coil having no signs of activation from a detachment controller, the investigation determined the separation of the implant is consistent with the coil experiencing tensile or retraction forces that exceeded the strength of the attachment monofilament.Besides the dried biomaterial within the lumen, no notable conditions were found on the returned microcatheter.Advancement testing could not be performed due to the damages on the returned components.The instructions for use (ifu) identifies premature coil detachment as a potential complication associated with the use of the device.
|
It was reported that during treatment for a ruptured carotid cavernous aneurysm, the embolization coil was difficult to advance in the microcatheter and during removal, the implant coil detached in the microcatheter.The coil was removed in its entirety together with the microcatheter.There was no reported patient injury or intervention.
|