• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. EPIK UNI KNEE; INSERT, ONLAY TIBIAL, EPIK, SIZE42X9

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. EPIK UNI KNEE; INSERT, ONLAY TIBIAL, EPIK, SIZE42X9 Back to Search Results
Model Number 340-42-009
Device Problems Naturally Worn (2988); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 10/24/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reason for this revision surgery was reported as excessive wear.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 4 years and 11 months apart.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The devices were returned to manufacturer and examined by registered medical assistant (rma) at djo surgical.A review of the device history records (dhr) shows that the poly insert met design and manufacturing requirements when released for use.There were no non-conforming material reports (ncmr) associated with the production of this lot that may have contributed to the reported event.The device was verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and was within its expiration date at the time of implantation.The vendor's certificate of conformance was reviewed, and it confirms that the poly insert's material met specifications per ms0002, revision d.No complaints have been filed against any other parts from this lot.Djo is aware of 16 other revisions surgeries due to worn poly inserts in the history of the epik system.There is no indication that there are any present trends or on-going issues that need review.A review of survivorship for epik knees, including a study of all wear-related complaints, has been conducted.It shows that djo's epik systems have a rate of survivorship (97.7%) that is higher than the industry standard, emphasizing that there is no larger manufacturing or design problem with epik parts.This analysis is attached to this complaint.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to excessive wear.There are several factors that may have contributed to the need to revise this epik system.The poly insert shows evidence of delamination, which is the product of oxidation, a factor known to accelerate wear.Additionally, point loading is common in unicondylar knee systems, meaning more load is focused in a single location of the poly insert.Furthermore, the location of this insert's wear is evidence of an off-center loading point, which is likely an indicator of surgical malalignment between the femur and the baseplate, which can also accelerate wear.Other patient contraindications that could have contributed to excessive poly wear include obesity, abnormal gait, and degenerative bone disease.There are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.Rma examination: the femur has returned with significant bone/cement still attached, indicating good fixation to the bone.The articulating surface has several minor scratches/scuffs, signs of usual wear.It also exhibits several series of parallel lines, small scratches indicative of metal wear from repeated articulating motion of the joint.The baseplate has returned with significant bone/cement still attached, indicating good fixation to the bone.A corner of the baseplate has developed some metal-metal wear, a sign that the femur was in contact with a region of the baseplate instead of only contacting the poly insert.The corner of the baseplate with metal-metal wear is the same corner where the poly insert has developed most of its wear.The poly insert is still affixed to the baseplate.The poly insert has returned with significant delamination.There is also extreme wear of the articulating surface, leaving behind a jagged surface with material missing entirely in the corner where the baseplate shows metal-metal wear.
 
Event Description
Revision surgery - revision for excessive wear.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EPIK UNI KNEE
Type of Device
INSERT, ONLAY TIBIAL, EPIK, SIZE42X9
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P.
9800 metric blvd
austin, tx 78758-5445
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P.
9800 metric blvd
austin, tx 78758-5445
Manufacturer Contact
teffany hutto
9800 metric blvd
austin, tx 78758-5445 
MDR Report Key9764216
MDR Text Key181334621
Report Number1644408-2020-00141
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRY
UDI-Device Identifier00888912116084
UDI-Public(01)00888912116084
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K020741
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/26/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2015
Device Model Number340-42-009
Device Catalogue Number340-42-009
Device Lot Number59600277
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/29/2020
Initial Date FDA Received02/27/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/14/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
-
-