• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC T2 STRATOSPHERE EXPANDABLE CORPECTOMY SYSTEM; SPINAL VERTEBRAL BODY REPLACEMENT DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC T2 STRATOSPHERE EXPANDABLE CORPECTOMY SYSTEM; SPINAL VERTEBRAL BODY REPLACEMENT DEVICE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 436120C
Device Problem Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 02/14/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product was not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Therefore, we are unable to determine the definitive cause of the reported event.Radiographic image review result: three images provided for l2 corpectomy with anterior instrumentation and l1-l3 posterior stabilization.The first ap x-ray shows the interbody cage translated out of the corpecting defect.The second image shows the endcap not in contact with the l1 interior end plate.The third image shows contact with the end plate.It is probable that the cage chipped and lost contact with the endplates along it to translate laterally.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent anterior vertebral body replacement at l2 due to burst fracture.Post-op, t3 backed out after it was inserted.Hence on (b)(6) 2020, during revision surgery, a patient position was taken and it was confirmed by checking the image that the implant has not been in contact with the endplate on the cranial side at all.It was performed after posterior fixation.The reason considered for backing out were the posterior screw loosened, and the anterior side opened.The t3 shrank after the operation.The third image was the image that was taken immediately after the operation.The frontal image right after the operation was not available, but it was considered that the position where the cage was placed had deviated a little from the center of the vertebral body.It was found that it has turned to the state of the first image three or four days after the initial surgery.The second image was taken during the revision surgery.When the implant was placed for the first time, it is unknown at this point that the implant has shrunk or the adjustable end cap was deviated.According to surgeon may be l3 had have compression fracture(it was unknown when compression fracture occurred).The product has been replaced with another implant on (b)(6).There were no other patient complications as a result of this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
T2 STRATOSPHERE EXPANDABLE CORPECTOMY SYSTEM
Type of Device
SPINAL VERTEBRAL BODY REPLACEMENT DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC
4340 swinea rd
memphis TN 38118
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC
4340 swinea rd
memphis TN 38118
Manufacturer Contact
stacie ziemba
1800 pyramid place
memphis, TN 38132
9013963133
MDR Report Key9822049
MDR Text Key188475189
Report Number1030489-2020-00299
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MQP
UDI-Device Identifier00643169634862
UDI-Public00643169634862
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K183510
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/11/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/11/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number436120C
Device Lot NumberCA18J204
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/14/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
-
-