As reported, during an unknown procedure, the hub of a beacon tip torcon nb advantage angiographic catheter separated from the device.Access was obtained in the radial artery using an amplatz extra stiff wire guide.Reportedly, the tip of the device became "disconfigured" as it entered the internal carotid.As the user twisted the device, the hub separated.Another manufacturer's catheter was used to complete the procedure.The patient's outcome is reported as good.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
Initial report: as reported, during an unknown procedure, the hub of a beacon tip torcon nb advantage angiographic catheter separated from the device.Access was obtained in the radial artery using an amplatz extra stiff wire guide.Reportedly, the tip of the device became "disconfigured" as it entered the internal carotid.As the user twisted the device, the hub separated.Another manufacturer's catheter was used to complete the procedure.The patient's outcome is reported as good.Investigation - evaluation: reviews of the drawing, documentation, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturer¿s instructions, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examinations could be performed; however, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.The lot number of the device is not known; accordingly, a review of the device history record could not be conducted.A review of the quality control procedures and manufacturing instructions was conducted, and no gaps were discovered.Thus, there is evidence to support that the device was manufactured to specification.An ifu is provided with this device which states, ¿upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ the ifu further notes as a precaution, ¿if resistance is encountered during manipulation, stop and determine the cause before proceeding any further.¿ based on the available information, investigation has concluded that, while the reason for the failure could not be determined, possible reasons for the occurrence could be complications related to patient anatomy, handling of the device, and/or the nature of the procedure.We will continue our monitoring of similar complaints and have notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|