The information provided by the reporter confirmed the initial assessment that the patient required medical intervention to preclude serious injury.The expulsion of the pe inlay may have been causing or contributing to the patient's pain.It was reported the patient had osteopenia; however, there was no indication if this caused or contributed to the migration/expulsion of the prodisc l inlay.The risk assessment identified 2 risks associated with inlay expulsion.There was no indication of new or unknown risks based on the information provided.Review of complaints determined the complaint rate is within allowable limits established in the dfmea.There are no capas associated with this complaint.Review of the pictures and x-rays provided confirmed inlay expulsion.The investigation could not determine a cause for this adverse event.The device was successfully retrieved and assigned pdl-rd-002 by the third party laboratory.If pertinent information becomes available from the retrieval testing, this report may be updated as appropriate.
|