The reported event was confirmed.Visual inspection noted 3 photo samples were received.Visual evaluation noted the photos show two bulb syringes with both of them having hair inside the barrel of the syringe.This is out of specification per inspection procedure, which states, "no hair is permitted on the product." although the reported event was confirmed, the root cause could not be determined.A potential root cause for this failure could be, ¿no follow up to the production areas cleaning procedure.¿ the device history record was reviewed and found nothing that could have caused or contributed to the reported event.A labeling review was not performed because the user alleged the presence of foreign material on the product, which the user did not cause.Labeling does not apply in this case.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|