• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE APC 2; ARGON PLASMA COAGULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE APC 2; ARGON PLASMA COAGULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number APC 2
Device Problem Output Problem (3005)
Patient Problem Bowel Perforation (2668)
Event Date 03/12/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The apc/esu system was returned and thoroughly inspected/tested (note: the accessories were not available for an evaluation.).A technical safety check was performed on each unit.This included an electrical safety check, a functional check of each of the equipment's features, and a power output check.Also, the gas flow rates were measured and found to be within their acceptable ranges for the apc.All features were/are functioning properly within specifications on both devices.In addition, no anomalies were found in the device history records (dhrs) for the apc and esu.In conclusion, no erbe equipment problem was found that would have caused or attributed to the event.Note: our review of the chronological data revealed that the system was not used on march 12th when according to the hospital the intervention work took place.Most likely, there were many factors involved in the reported incident.However, the patient's condition in all likelihood was a key factor in the outcome.That is, having to perform argon plasma coagulation in the right colon, a very thin-walled area of the bowel.Specifically, upon the intervention, the remaining tissue of the bowl did not stay intact which resulted in the perforation.In conclusion, no determination could be made as to the cause of the event.Note: if an arc arises between the active electrode and tissue, low-frequency current can occur which may have caused the reported muscle twitching which is known in the literature as neuromuscular stimulation and also described in the safety instructions of the user manuals.No trends have been identified.Erbe usa, inc.Is now closing the file on this event.
 
Event Description
It was reported that an erbe system, argon plasma coagulator (apc) with an electrosurgical unit (esu/generator, model vio 200 d, part number (p/n) 10140-200, serial number (b)(4)) was involved in a patient incident.The system was used with an apc probe (p/n 20132-225, lot number 143887) and a split return electrode (p/n 9160 f, lot number unknown).During intervention work in the cecum (also referred to as the right colon).During each activation, the patient twitched.The next day, a perforation was detected in the cecum.To address the issue, an operation was performed on the patient.Note: system distributed to a hospital in (b)(6).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ERBE APC 2
Type of Device
ARGON PLASMA COAGULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse
tubingen 72072
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse
tubingen 72072
GM  
Manufacturer Contact
john tartal
2225 northwest parkway
marietta, ga 
MDR Report Key9876768
MDR Text Key195289329
Report Number9610614-2020-00007
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K024047
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/25/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberAPC 2
Device Catalogue Number10134-000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/17/2020
Device Age3 YR
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/18/2020
Initial Date FDA Received03/25/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/01/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age76 YR
-
-