A field service engineer (fse) conducted a site visit and inspected the sorter lock sensor and lock mechanism and found no issues.The sorter drawer may have not been closed far enough for the lock to engage.The fse was able to reproduce the 4053 error by running the sorter test.The fse found that the d lane needed to be realigned, and the sorter d lane position parameter adjusted within specification.The fse also saw issues with cups not having the seal broken correctly.Adjusting the d lane and associated parameters resolved the seal break and sorter z error.The fse verified this with the sorter test, cup transfer test, and the seal break 10 test.The fse used customer prepared controls.Customer accepted the quality control.The aia-900 analyzer is functioning as expected.No further action required by field service.A 13-month complaint history review and service history review for similar complaints were performed for the serial number (b)(4) from of (b)(6) 2019 through aware date of (b)(6) 2020.There were no similar complaints identified during the searched period.The aia-900 operator's manual under section 12 - flags and error messages states the following: sorter drawer lock open.Cause: a sorter drawer "unlocked" status was detected during operation, causing measurement to be paused.Action: press the cup sorter key to lock the drawer.Measurement will resume.Sorter-z home overrun.Cause: the home sensor s2022, which is not supposed to be activated after the sorter z-axis moves, was activated.A retry will take place, and if there is no improvement a flag will be attached to the measurement result.Action: please contact tosoh local representatives.Check s022 and also check to see the cause of slipping, and so on, that occurs when pm022 moves to the limit side.The most probable cause of the reported sorter drawer lock open was due to the sorter not being closed properly.The most probable cause of the reported sorter z home overrun was due to misaligned sorter dispense lane positioning and seal breaker.Submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the manufacturer's product caused or contributed to the event.
|