• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA COIL 400; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA COIL 400; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Model Number 4004C0815-A
Device Problems Break (1069); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/18/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2020-00536.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the vein of galen using penumbra coils 400 (pc400s) and a px slim delivery microcatheter (px slim).During the procedure, the physician placed four pc400s in the vein using the px slim.While advancing the next pc400, the physician experienced resistance, and the friction lock on the introducer sheath broke; therefore, the pc400 was removed.It is unknown if the pc400 entered the px slim.The physician continued the procedure and placed another pc400 in the vein.While advancing the next pc400 through the px slim, the pc400 broke; subsequently, the physician removed part of the pc400 with the pusher assembly attached.The rest of the pc400 that was still inside the px slim was pushed into the vein.The procedure was complete with other pc400s, non-penumbra coils, and the same px slim.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of its pusher assembly.The pusher assembly was kinked approximately 5.0 cm from its proximal end.The embolization coil was intact with its pusher assembly.Conclusions: evaluation of the first returned pc400 was unable to confirm the resistance experienced.Further evaluation revealed a proximal kink.This damage was not reported; therefore, is likely incidental to the reported event.The returned pc400 was able to be advanced through a demonstration microcatheter up to the kink without an issue.The reported event was unable to be confirmed.Evaluation of the second pc400 returned revealed an undamaged, functional device with the embolization coil intact with the pusher assembly.The reported event of a detached coil was not confirmed.This indicates the wrong device was returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2020-00536 h3 other text : placeholder.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following section was incorrectly reported on the initial mfr report and is being corrected on this follow-up #2 mfr report: (b)(4).1.Section b.Box 5.Describe event or problem this report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2020-00536 h3 other text : placeholder.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the vein of galen using penumbra coils 400 (pc400s) and a px slim delivery microcatheter (px slim).During the procedure, the physician placed four pc400s in the vein using the px slim.While advancing the next pc400, the physician experienced resistance while advancing coil.Therefore, the pc400 was removed.The physician continued the procedure and placed another pc400 in the vein.While advancing the next pc400 through the px slim, the coil unintentionally detached.Subsequently, the physician removed the pusher assembly with part of the coil still attached.The rest of the coil that remained in the px slim was pushed into the vein.The procedure was complete with other pc400s, non-penumbra coils, and the same px slim.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA COIL 400
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key9941315
MDR Text Key187951427
Report Number3005168196-2020-00535
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548018522
UDI-Public00814548018522
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K173614
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,03/18/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/08/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number4004C0815-A
Device Catalogue Number4004C0815
Device Lot NumberF90467
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/23/2020
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received01/14/2005
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age4 DA
-
-